← Diary Entry Iannuzzi Citations →
This page has three parts: Independent Biblical Identification, Cross-Entry Synthesis, and Observation Notes.
11-1912-09-29 Biblical Resonance Analysis
Volume 11 — September 29, 1912 “The Divine Will in Jesus is the center, the life and the origin of everything in Him. Jesus is the One who disposes the intentions of one who lives in His Will, in whatever he does. Only Jesus is enough for him, while earthly things do not attract his will; so, if he eats, it is only according to the Will of God.”
STAGE ONE — Independent Biblical Identification
The Most Favored Soul: The Will as Center of Everything
“Do you know who has been most favored by Me? The soul to whom I manifested the prodigies and the power of my Most Holy Will. All other things are parts of Me, while my Will is the center, the life and the holder of everything. My Will directed my Passion, gave life to my Heart, and exalted the Cross. My Will understands everything, catches everything, and activates everything - my Will is greater than anything.”
The entry opens with a doctrinal hierarchy that reorders all revelations of Christ. The Passion, the Sacred Heart, the Cross — all are “parts” of Christ, facets of a whole. The Divine Will is not a part but the center — the life-principle and cohering force from which all other mysteries derive their reality.
Colossians 1:17 — “He is before all things, and in him all things are held together.” The Son as the cosmic cohesion-principle is the scriptural ground for the Will as “the holder of everything.” The Will’s function of holding all things — Passion, Heart, Cross — in coherence is the Christological form of this Pauline claim. Christological/Trinitarian
Hebrews 10:7 — “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come (in the scroll of the book it is written of me) to do your will, O God.’” The Passion as the supreme act of the Divine Will finds its scriptural ground here: “my Will directed my Passion” is the reverse side of the Incarnate Son’s fundamental posture. The Passion was directed by the Will because the Will chose it — obedience to the Father’s will is the interior principle of the entire redemptive arc. Christological/Trinitarian
Philippians 2:8 — “And being found in human form, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to the point of death, yes, the death of the cross.” The Will’s exaltation of the Cross — “my Will… exalted the Cross” — is the Will’s interior affirmation of what appeared as humiliation: the Cross is exalted because it is the Will’s chosen means, and the Will exalts whatever it inhabits. Christological/Trinitarian
John 17:21–23 — “that they may all be one; even as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that you sent me. The glory which you have given me, I have given to them, that they may be one, even as we are one, I in them, and you in me, that they may be perfected into one, that the world may know that you sent me and loved them, even as you loved me.” The soul in the Will participates in the Trinitarian union that the Will itself constitutes — the center of Trinitarian life is the Will, and the soul admitted to the Will’s secrets enters this center. Direct doctrinal parallel
The Soul in the Will as Passion, Heart, Cross, and Redemption
“The one who is in my Will is also in my Passion; she is my Heart; she is all the beauty of my Cross and she is my very Redemption. Nothing dissimilar exists between us. Therefore, I want you completely in my Will, if you want to take part in my goods.”
Galatians 2:20 — “I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. That life which I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself up for me.” The “nothing dissimilar exists between us” identity-statement is the AJD-1 formulation at its highest degree. The dissolution of the I leaves only Christ — making the soul not a participant in the Passion from outside but the Passion’s present continuation from within. Direct doctrinal parallel
Romans 8:17 — “and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified with him.” The soul as co-heir in all Christ’s mysteries — Passion, Heart, Cross, Redemption — is precisely the content of this verse, extended by the diary to its full consequences: if co-heir, then not merely participant but identified with the mystery itself. Direct doctrinal parallel
Colossians 1:27 — “to whom God was pleased to make known what are the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.” The soul in the Will and Christ in the soul — the mutual indwelling — is the mechanism by which she “is” His Passion and Heart: because He is in her, she is in everything He is. Direct doctrinal parallel
2 Corinthians 5:21 — “For him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” The exchange at the heart of redemption — Christ becoming what we are so that we might become what He is — prefigures the diary’s claim that the soul in the Will “is my very Redemption.” The soteriological logic ends here: the soul is not merely redeemed but becomes the ongoing embodiment of the redemptive reality. Christological/Trinitarian
Deuteronomy 6:4–5 — “Hear, Israel: The LORD is our God. The LORD is one. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might.” The undivided total-love command is the governing ground for “I want you completely in my Will” — the Will admits no partition; the soul who enters must bring the whole of herself, just as the love commanded by the Shema is the whole of the self. Direct doctrinal parallel
The DW Soul Has No Need to Dispose Her Own Intentions
“My daughter, one who lives in my Will and does her things because I want it so, does not need to dispose her intentions. Since she is in my Will, as she operates, prays or suffers, I Myself dispose these things the way I please… Being the owner, I make of them whatever I please. It is not so for those who are not in my Will: they dispose, and I respect their will.”
The second teaching discloses a consequence of terminal union: the soul whose will is one with the divine Will no longer needs to formulate the intention of her own acts. Jesus, as the owner of all her acts, disposes them according to His perfect knowledge — for reparation, for love, for adoration — better than the soul’s own limited intention-setting could achieve.
Romans 8:26–27 — “In the same way, the Spirit also helps our weaknesses, for we don’t know how to pray as we ought. But the Spirit himself makes intercession for us with groanings which can’t be uttered. He who searches the hearts knows what is on the Spirit’s mind, because he makes intercession for the saints according to God.” The Spirit disposing the soul’s prayer according to the Will is the most direct scriptural parallel to Jesus disposing the DW soul’s intentions: what the Spirit does for the praying soul in weakness, Jesus does for the DW soul’s every act in fullness. The entry extends the Romans 8:26 principle from prayer to all acts. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Corinthians 6:19–20 — “Or don’t you know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. Therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.” The soul is not the owner of her own acts — they belong to God. “Being the owner, I make of them whatever I please” is the DW fulfillment of what is ontologically true of every soul; the DW soul has fully recognized and surrendered to this truth, while others have not yet understood it. Direct doctrinal parallel
Proverbs 16:3 — “Commit your deeds to the LORD, and your plans shall succeed.” The divine ownership of the soul’s committed works — when entirely surrendered to the Lord, He establishes them according to His wisdom. The DW soul’s act-intention being disposed by Jesus is the fullest realization of this principle. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 15:16 — “You didn’t choose me, but I chose you and appointed you, that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain; that whatever you will ask of the Father in my name, he may give it to you.” The divine appointment of the soul’s fruitfulness — Jesus disposing the soul’s acts toward their optimal purpose. The appointment is not passive but active: He chose, He appointed, the fruit abides. Direct doctrinal parallel
Psalm 37:4–5 — “Also delight yourself in the LORD, and he will give you the desires of your heart. Commit your way to the LORD. Trust also in him, and he will do this:” The soul who commits her way entirely to God — including the direction of all her acts — and lets Him act: the posture the DW soul embodies, and which produces the outcome the Psalm promises. Affective/meditative
Return to Ordinary Life: Celestial Children Taking Earthly Things in the Will
“After I have trained her well, for years and years, no longer fearing that the senses might shade her… I give her back to ordinary life, because I want my children to take part in the things that I created for love of them - but according to my Will, not to theirs… to see these souls who, like celestial children, take the necessary things with sacrifice, detachment, and according to my Will… is for Me the most beautiful reparation.”
The third teaching describes the arc of spiritual formation and its completion. At the beginning, the soul is detached even from food to establish her in celestial heights. After the formation is complete — after years — she is given back to ordinary life. The return is not a regression but the fulfillment of creation’s intent: the DW soul receives created goods as God created them to be received, in His Will, which itself becomes reparation for those who receive them in self-will.
Romans 8:19 — “For the creation waits with eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed.” The DW souls taking earthly things in the Will are the sons (children) of God whose manifestation creation is waiting for — they receive created goods as creation was designed to be received, redeeming the use of creation by the manner of their reception. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Corinthians 10:31 — “Whether therefore you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” The diary’s specific application — eating and drinking according to the Will — is the enactment of this Pauline principle: the most basic bodily acts become the locus of divine glory through the Will. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Timothy 4:4–5 — “For every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving. For it is sanctified through the word of God and prayer.” Created goods made holy through the manner of reception — “received with thanksgiving” in the diary’s context means received in the Will, which makes even food and drink a holy and reparatory act. Direct doctrinal parallel
Colossians 3:17 — “Whatever you do, in word or in deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.” The totality of earthly acts — including eating and drinking — transformed by being done in the Lord’s name. The DW soul’s return to ordinary life is the radical enactment of this Pauline imperative. Direct doctrinal parallel
Hebrews 5:8 — “though he was a Son, yet learned obedience by the things which he suffered.” The formation arc described in this entry — years of suffering and detachment producing the completed soul who can then receive ordinary life freely — parallels the Son’s own learning-through-suffering pattern. The training is not punitive but constitutive; obedience is learned through what is endured. Typological
Genesis 1:29–31 — “And God said, ‘Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed… and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food… And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.‘” The created goods — food, drink — as gifts of love from God to His children. The DW soul who eats “according to my Will” receives these goods as God’s original creative intent: as “very good” love-gifts received in love, not as earthly necessities tolerated or indulged. Typological
Isaiah 65:13–14 — “Therefore the Lord GOD says, “Behold, my servants will eat, but you will be hungry; behold, my servants will drink, but you will be thirsty. Behold, my servants will rejoice, but you will be disappointed. Behold, my servants will sing for joy of heart, but you will cry for sorrow of heart, and will wail for anguish of spirit.” The contrast between the Lord’s servants who receive in His provision and those who receive in self-will — the diary’s distinction between DW souls and those who “use natural goods with attachment and not according to my Will.” Typological
STAGE TWO — Comparison with Hogan’s Commentary
CORRESPONDENCES
Deuteronomy 6:4–5 — Both identified. Hogan cites verses 4–10 for the undivided-heart principle — “the Lord will not accept a divided heart” — mapped to “I want you completely in my Will.” Stage One identifies the Shema as the doctrinal ground for the total-self demand.
Romans 8:19 — Both identified. Hogan cites for “celestial children who are sons of God.” Stage One identifies it for the same function: the sons of God whose manifestation creation waits for, receiving created goods as creation was designed to be received.
DEVIATIONS
No divergent citations for the same concept. All differences are additions.
ADDITIONS — MINE
- Colossians 1:17 — “in him all things hold together”; the Will as “holder of everything” in scriptural form
- Hebrews 10:7 — “I have come to do your will, O God”; the Passion as the supreme act of the Divine Will
- Philippians 2:8 — obedience to death on a cross; the Will’s exaltation of what it chose
- John 17:21–23 — Trinitarian unity; the soul in the Will entering the center of Trinitarian life
- Galatians 2:20 — “no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me”; the doctrinal ground of “nothing dissimilar exists between us”
- Romans 8:17 — fellow heirs with Christ in all His mysteries; Passion, Heart, Cross, Redemption
- Colossians 1:27 — “Christ in you, the hope of glory”; the mutual indwelling mechanism
- 2 Corinthians 5:21 — the redemptive exchange; the soul becoming the ongoing embodiment of the redemptive reality
- Romans 8:26–27 — the Spirit disposing the soul’s prayer according to the Will; the scriptural parallel for Jesus disposing all the DW soul’s intentions
- 1 Corinthians 6:19–20 — “you are not your own”; the divine ownership of the soul’s acts
- Proverbs 16:3 — “commit your work to the LORD and your plans will be established”
- John 15:16 — divine appointment of the soul’s fruitfulness
- Psalm 37:4–5 — “commit your way to the LORD; trust in him, and he will act”
- 1 Corinthians 10:31 — “whether you eat or drink… do all to the glory of God”
- 1 Timothy 4:4–5 — everything created by God is good; received with thanksgiving it is made holy
- Colossians 3:17 — “whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus”
- Hebrews 5:8 — “learned obedience through what he suffered”; the formation-through-suffering pattern
- Genesis 1:29–31 — created goods as gifts of love; the DW soul restoring creation’s original reception
- Isaiah 65:13–14 — the Lord’s servants who eat and drink in His provision vs. those who are hungry and thirsty
ADDITIONS — HERS
“My Will directed my Passion” as Christological reorientation: Hogan unpacks the doctrinal claim that it was the divine Will — not the Jews, not Pilate — who directed the Passion, citing John 19:11 (“you would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above”) as the contextual support. Jesus tells Pilate the source of his authority is above; this is the external sign that the Will, not human agency, governs the Passion’s course. This is Hogan’s crucial interpretive contribution to Part 1.
The piggy-bank analogy for intention-disposal: Hogan offers the pastoral analogy of a child depositing pennies without directing their use — allowing the parent to decide what to do with the whole amount when sufficient — as a teaching illustration for the intention-disposal doctrine. No scripture cited. The implicit background is Proverbs 16:3 (Stage One: “commit your work to the LORD”).
“Dregs and dung” as translation choice for earthly goods: Hogan’s deliberate use of “dregs” and “dung” (rather than milder translations like “mud and slime”) for the diary’s characterization of earthly things reflects Philippians 3:8 (“I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ”). The soul who has tasted the celestial cannot return to earthly things as primary goods — Paul’s “rubbish” language is the Pauline precedent.
Note on eating as first recorded instance of Luisa retaining food: Hogan notes that this is the first time the diary records that Luisa has reached the point of being able to retain food without being forced to bring it up — a biographical observation with significance for understanding the formation arc described in the third teaching.
STAGE TWO SYNTHESIS
Both sources converge on Deuteronomy 6:4–5 (undivided heart) and Romans 8:19 (sons of God revealing) as load-bearing anchors. Hogan’s most significant unique contribution is the Christological reorientation of the Passion-as-Will teaching — her deployment of John 19:11 (“you would have no authority unless given from above”) supplies the specific Gospel text that supports “my Will directed my Passion.” Stage One extends the analysis substantially into the full Christological range of Part 1 (Colossians 1:17; Hebrews 10:7; Philippians 2:8; John 17:21–23; 2 Corinthians 5:21) and the Pauline ownership-and-intention framework of Part 2 (Romans 8:26–27; 1 Corinthians 6:19–20; Proverbs 16:3). Part 3 finds its most theologically significant scriptural development in Romans 8:19 (both sources), 1 Corinthians 10:31, and 1 Timothy 4:4–5. The entry’s three teachings are unified by a single doctrinal trajectory: the Will as center of all (Part 1) → the Will as owner of all the soul’s acts (Part 2) → the Will as the redemptive medium through which even ordinary life becomes reparation (Part 3).
Cross-Entry Synthesis
Volume 11 — September 29, 1912 “The Divine Will in Jesus is the center, the life and the origin of everything in Him. Jesus is the One who disposes the intentions of one who lives in His Will, in whatever he does. Only Jesus is enough for him, while earthly things do not attract his will; so, if he eats, it is only according to the Will of God.”
The Will as Center: The Most Favored Soul
The doctrinal hierarchy Jesus establishes in Part 1 is among the most theologically significant statements in Volume 11. Passion, Sacred Heart, and Cross — all the great objects of Catholic devotion — are named as “parts” of Christ; the Divine Will is named as their center, life, and cohesion-principle. This reorders the entire devotional map: the individual mysteries derive their reality from the Will that animated them.
Colossians 1:17 gives the cosmic form: “in him all things hold together.” The Will holds all the Christological mysteries in their coherent unity. Hebrews 10:7 discloses the interior principle: the Passion was directed by the Will because the Son came to do the Father’s will, and the Passion was the supreme expression of that doing. Philippians 2:8 supplies the Will’s exaltation of the Cross from within — the obedience “to death, even death on a cross” is exalted because it is the Will’s chosen instrument.
Hogan’s distinctive contribution — John 19:11 (“you would have no authority unless given from above”) as documentary evidence that the Passion was governed from above — gives the specific Gospel anchor for “my Will directed my Passion.” The exchange with Pilate is the one moment where Jesus explicitly names the governing source of what is being carried out.
The Soul in the Will as All the Mysteries
The AJD-1 identity-statement reaches its highest degree: “she is my Passion; she is my Heart; she is all the beauty of my Cross and she is my very Redemption. Nothing dissimilar exists between us.” This is not participation in the mysteries but identification with them. Galatians 2:20 is the closest Pauline parallel; even that stops short — Paul says “Christ lives in me” while the diary says the soul IS the mystery, no dissimilarity remaining.
Romans 8:17 gives the inheritance framework: co-heir in suffering and glory. 2 Corinthians 5:21 discloses the mechanism: the redemptive exchange ends with the soul becoming what Christ is in redemptive function — the beneficiary of redemption becomes its ongoing embodiment.
Deuteronomy 6:4–5 (both sources) governs the response: “I want you completely in my Will.” The Will that encompasses all the Christological mysteries requires the whole soul — an undivided, Shema-level totality of self-offering.
No Need to Dispose Intentions: Divine Ownership of Acts
Part 2 is the logical consequence of terminal union. The soul formulating her own intentions is operating from a residual self-position — still functioning as the owner of her acts. The DW soul has fully recognized what is ontologically true of every soul: “you are not your own” (1 Corinthians 6:19–20).
Romans 8:26–27 is the closest scriptural precedent: the Spirit interceding “according to the will of God” when the soul does not know how to pray. The diary extends this from prayer to all acts, and from weakness to the fullness of DW union. Where Romans 8:26 addresses the ordinary condition of not knowing how to pray, the diary addresses the completed condition of not needing to formulate the direction of any act — because the Will already governs.
The distinction between DW souls (Jesus disposes) and others (Jesus respects their self-directed intentions) maps the range: self-direction is not wrong — “I respect their will” — but it is less than the freedom the DW soul enjoys. John 15:16 gives the theological ground: He chose and appointed that the fruit should abide. Abiding fruit requires the Chooser to direct the bearing.
Return to Ordinary Life: Created Goods in the Will
Part 3 explicitly names the end of the ICW-1 formation arc. The food-detachment phase is named as completing after “years and years”: “I give her back to ordinary life.” The formation’s purpose was to establish beyond doubt that God alone suffices; having done so, the soul can now receive ordinary things freely because she has been freed from them as necessities. The freedom to receive created goods is the fruit of having been freed from needing them.
Romans 8:19 (both sources) — the sons of God whose manifestation creation awaits — gives the ecclesiological dimension: the DW soul taking food and drink in the Will is restoring creation’s original reception. Creation was given for love, to be received in love; the DW soul’s eating in the Will is the firstfruits of that restoration. 1 Timothy 4:4–5 supplies the doctrinal ground: nothing created is to be rejected if received with thanksgiving — and the DW soul’s thanksgiving is the Will’s own reception, which makes the act holy. Genesis 1:29–31 reaches back to creation’s intent: God gave these goods to His children as an act of love; the DW soul receives them as God created them to be received.
The reparatory function is Part 3’s most striking doctrinal claim: seeing DW souls take necessities “with sacrifice, detachment, and according to my Will” is “the most beautiful reparation” for those who misuse natural goods. The reparation is not penance added to eating — it is the manner of eating in the Will that constitutes the reparation.
Synthesis
Three registers corresponding to the three parts: Christological-cosmic (Colossians 1:17; Hebrews 10:7; John 17:21–23), Pauline union-and-ownership (Galatians 2:20; Romans 8:17; 1 Corinthians 6:19–20; Romans 8:26–27), and creation-theology (Romans 8:19; 1 Corinthians 10:31; 1 Timothy 4:4–5; Genesis 1:29–31). All three are unified by a single doctrinal trajectory: the Will as governing center of all Christological reality → as owner of all the DW soul’s acts → as the redemptive medium through which even eating and drinking become reparation.
The three findings of highest theological significance:
First, the reordering of all Christological mysteries under the Will: Passion, Heart, and Cross are “parts” while the Will is the directing, animating, and exalting center. This establishes the Will as the first principle of Christological theology rather than one devotional object among many.
Second, the AJD-1 identity-statement at its highest degree: “nothing dissimilar exists between us” — the soul in the Will does not participate in but is identified with the Christological mysteries. The exchange of 2 Corinthians 5:21 reaches its terminal form: the soul becomes the ongoing embodiment of the redemptive reality.
Third, the ICW-1 formation-arc completion signal: the end of the food-detachment phase is named explicitly as a completion — the dying-to-natural-necessities has accomplished its purpose, and the soul is returned to ordinary life now capable of receiving created goods in the Will, which itself becomes the most beautiful reparation.
Observation Notes
See this note in volume context →
11-1912-09-29
PDW-1 — comprehensive summit statement: “All other things are parts of Me, while my Will is the center, the life and the holder of everything. My Will directed my Passion, gave life to my Heart, and exalted the Cross.” This is the most comprehensive PDW-1 statement in the corpus: the Will as the first principle not merely of creation and the Eucharist (as established at the opening of PDW-1 in March 1912) but of every Christological mystery — Passion, Sacred Heart, Cross, Redemption. All other mysteries are “parts”; the Will is the center from which they derive their reality. This constitutes a formal advance of PDW-1 into Christological-architectonic territory.
AJD-1 — identity-statement at its highest degree: “The one who is in my Will is also in my Passion; she is my Heart; she is all the beauty of my Cross and she is my very Redemption. Nothing dissimilar exists between us.” The AJD-1 “another Me” reality reaches its most ontologically intense formulation. Prior AJD-1 entries identified the soul as another Jesus, as fellow-worker, as co-creator; this entry names her as identified with each Christological mystery — not a participant but the mystery’s ongoing embodiment. “Nothing dissimilar” is the governing phrase.
ICW-1 — formation-arc completion explicitly named: Jesus describes the food-detachment phase as a completed arc: “After I have trained her well, for years and years… I give her back to ordinary life.” This is ICW-1’s interior-crucifixion extended to bodily necessities and then explicitly named as having accomplished its purpose. The dying-to-natural-necessities is declared complete; the soul is returned to ordinary life now equipped to receive created goods in the Will. ICW-1’s formation phase has a formal terminus. This is a significant ICW-1 structural signal.
SUW-1 — intention-disposal as functional evidence of terminal union: The second teaching — Jesus disposing all the DW soul’s intentions without the soul needing to formulate them — advances SUW-1 from the side of functional unity: one intention-source for the soul’s acts indicates an approach to the “one will between them” state. The soul does not direct; Jesus directs. The closest this has come to the functional terminus in Volume 11.
Biographical note (Hogan): Hogan identifies this as the first time the diary records that Luisa has reached the point of being able to retain food without being forced to bring it up — a biographical detail correlating with the formation-arc completion Jesus describes in the third teaching.