← Diary Entry Iannuzzi Citations →
This page has three parts: Independent Biblical Identification, Cross-Entry Synthesis, and Observation Notes.
11-1915-11-13 Biblical Resonance Analysis
Volume 11 — November 13, 1915 “In instituting the Most Holy Eucharist, before giving Himself to creatures, Jesus wanted to receive Himself. In the Divine Will the soul must offer Communion as Jesus did.”
STAGE ONE — Independent Biblical Identification
Jesus Communing Himself — The Founding Self-Gift
“Before giving Communion to the others, I gave Communion to Myself, and I wanted to do this in order to give to the Father the complete glory of all the Communions of creatures, and to enclose within Me all the reparations for all the sacrileges, for all the offenses that my Humanity would receive in the Sacrament.”
Matthew 26:26 — “As they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks for it, and broke it. He gave to the disciples and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” The institution narrative — the entry’s self-communion claim is implicit in the institution: Jesus is the one who takes, blesses, and gives; the question the entry answers is what Jesus did with the bread and cup before giving. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Corinthians 11:24–26 — “When he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “Take, eat. This is my body, which is broken for you. Do this in memory of me.” … For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.” The institution’s memorial structure — the self-communion Jesus made was not merely sequential but constitutive: the “for you” of his body given was preceded by his own reception of what he was about to give, so that the giving carries the seal of his own worthy reception. Direct doctrinal parallel
Hebrews 7:27 — “who doesn’t need, like those high priests, to offer up sacrifices daily, … he did this once for all, when he offered up himself.” The high priest who is also the sacrifice — Jesus receiving himself at the institution is the self-offering of the High Priest who both presents and receives: the action is complete in itself, once for all, carrying all reparations and all glory within its single self-directed act. Direct doctrinal parallel
Hebrews 9:12 — “nor yet through the blood of goats and calves, but through his own blood, entered in once for all into the Holy Place, having obtained eternal redemption.” The eternal redemption secured in one act — the self-communion “enclosed within Me all the reparations of all times” because the eternal redemption secured in the single High-Priestly act encompasses all times simultaneously. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 17:19 — “For their sakes I sanctify myself, that they themselves also may be sanctified in truth.” The self-consecration for the sake of others — “I gave Communion to Myself” and “I wanted to do this in order to give to the Father the complete glory of all the Communions of creatures” is the Eucharistic form of the John 17:19 structure: the self-consecration is for the sake of others, so that they may be sanctified in the truth that his self-communion establishes. Direct doctrinal parallel
Psalm 22:25 — “My praise of you comes in the great assembly. I will pay my vows before those who fear him.” The praise offered before the congregation — the self-communion as the act from which all congregational praise derives: Jesus giving to the Father the complete glory of all communions by first receiving himself, then opening the door for all others to receive. Affective/meditative
Enclosing All Reparations, Divinizing All Works, Sealing All Communions
“Since I enclosed the Divine Will, I enclosed all the reparations of all times… Since all the works of the creatures were Divinized by my Humanity, I wanted to seal the communions of the creatures with my Communion. Otherwise, how could the creature receive a God? It was my Humanity that opened this door to the creatures.”
Hebrews 10:5–7 — “Therefore when he comes into the world, he says, “You didn’t desire sacrifice and offering, but you prepared a body for me. You had no pleasure in whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin. Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come (in the scroll of the book it is written of me) to do your will, O God.’” The body prepared as the instrument of the total will-offering — the Humanity that enclosed the Divine Will is this body-for-the-Will, prepared for the specific purpose of doing the will perfectly. Within this body-and-Will the reparations of all times are enclosed. Direct doctrinal parallel
Colossians 1:17, 19 — “He is before all things, and in him all things are held together. For all the fullness was pleased to dwell in him,” The all-things-holding-together in Christ and the fullness dwelling — the self-communion that enclosed “all the reparations of all times” is the creaturely-temporal expression of what Colossians names as the ontological reality: the fullness dwelling in him means he can enclose the fullness of all creaturely reparation. Christological/Trinitarian
Romans 5:18–19 — “So then as through one trespass, all men were condemned; even so through one act of righteousness, all men were justified to life. For as through the one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the one, many will be made righteous.” The one act enclosing the effect for all — the self-communion as the one Eucharistic act whose reparatory scope is universal, because it was performed by the one Humanity whose act is structurally capable of enclosing all. Direct doctrinal parallel
2 Corinthians 1:22 — “who also sealed us and gave us the down payment of the Spirit in our hearts.” The divine seal as the confirmation and authentication of what God has granted — “I wanted to seal the communions of the creatures with my Communion” is the Eucharistic form of this sealing: the self-communion is the authenticating seal placed on all subsequent communions, certifying their divine origin and efficacy. Direct doctrinal parallel
Ephesians 1:13 — “In him you also, having heard the word of the truth, the Good News of your salvation—in whom, having also believed, you were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,” The seal of the Spirit authenticating the believer’s reception of salvation — the self-communion’s sealing function corresponds to the Spirit’s seal: both are divine acts of authentication impressed upon creaturely reception, enabling what would otherwise be impossible. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 1:14 — “The Word became flesh and lived among us. We saw his glory, such glory as of the only born Son of the Father, full of grace and truth.” The Incarnation as the door-opening act — “It was my Humanity that opened this door to the creatures, giving them merit to receive Me.” The Word-made-flesh is the structural change that made the flesh-bearer capable of bearing God, and by extension made all flesh-bearers capable of receiving the Word-made-flesh. Direct doctrinal parallel
Hebrews 2:17 — “Therefore he was obligated in all things to be made like his brothers, that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make atonement for the sins of the people.” The Incarnation as the condition of priestly qualification — “how could the creature receive a God? It was my Humanity that opened this door” is the rhetorical form of Hebrews 2:17’s logic: only because the High Priest became like his brothers can those brothers receive him. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Timothy 2:5 — “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” The one Mediator as the structural ground of human access to God — the self-communion establishes the Mediator’s unique capacity: he alone can give himself to the Father with complete glory on behalf of all communions, because he alone is the one Mediator in whom both directions of the exchange are possible. Direct doctrinal parallel
The DW Soul’s Communion — Enclosing Everything, Becoming Another Me
“You — my daughter, do it in my Will; unite it to my Humanity. In this way you will enclose everything, and I will find in you the reparations of all, the reward for everything, and my satisfaction. Even more, I will find in you another Me.”
Colossians 3:17 — “Whatever you do, in word or in deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.” The doing of everything in the name of Jesus — “do it in my Will; unite it to my Humanity” is the specific Eucharistic instruction of what Colossians 3:17 names as the general Christian norm: every action in the Lord’s name, united to his act, encloses the completeness his name contains. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 14:20 — “In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you.” The mutual indwelling as the precondition for the soul’s communion enclosing everything — the soul united to the Humanity in the Will is the soul in whom the mutual indwelling of John 14:20 is fully operative, so that her enclosing of everything follows from the structural reality of her union with the one who already encloses all. Christological/Trinitarian
Galatians 2:20 — “I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. That life which I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself up for me.” The life of Christ living in the soul as the ground of the “another Me” finding — Jesus will find “another Me” because Christ lives in the soul; the soul’s Communion united to the Humanity is the act in which this living-in-me becomes perceptible to Jesus as his own reflection. Direct doctrinal parallel
Hebrews 13:15 — “Through him, then, let’s offer up a sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of lips which proclaim allegiance to his name.” The continual sacrifice of praise offered through Christ — the soul’s communion offered in the Will united to the Humanity is this sacrifice of praise in its Eucharistic form: through him, in his Will, every communion becomes the continual sacrifice that encloses “the reparations of all.” Direct doctrinal parallel
Revelation 5:8 — “Now when he had taken the book, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each one having a harp, and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.” The saints’ prayers as the golden bowls of incense before the Lamb — the “reward for everything and my satisfaction” Jesus finds in the soul’s communion is the content of these bowls: the creaturely prayer and reparation gathered into the divine presence through the mediatorial act. Typological
1 Corinthians 11:28 — “But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup.” The examination before communion — the soul who does it in the Will and united to the Humanity is the one whose self-examination has been replaced by Christ’s own self-examination: she receives worthily not by her own moral achievement but by uniting her communion to the one who received himself worthily. Direct doctrinal parallel
STAGE TWO — Comparison with Hogan’s Commentary
CORRESPONDENCES
No explicit Scripture cited by Hogan in this commentary. Her treatment is expository and applicative throughout.
DEVIATIONS
None applicable.
ADDITIONS — MINE
- Matthew 26:26 — the institution narrative; the self-communion implicit in the institution’s sequence
- 1 Corinthians 11:24–26 — the “for you” given after the self-reception; the memorial structure
- Hebrews 7:27 — high priest who offers himself once for all; self-offering and self-reception unified
- Hebrews 9:12 — eternal redemption secured in one act; the all-times enclosure
- John 17:19 — self-consecration for the sake of others; the Eucharistic form of this structure
- Psalm 22:25 — praise from the congregation derived from the prior self-offering
- Hebrews 10:5–7 — the body prepared for the total will-offering; Humanity as the Will’s instrument
- Colossians 1:17, 19 — in him all things hold together; the fullness enabling the enclosure of all
- Romans 5:18–19 — one act of righteousness enclosing justification for all
- 2 Corinthians 1:22 — the divine seal authenticating reception
- Ephesians 1:13 — sealed with the Spirit; the sealing structure parallel
- John 1:14 — the Word became flesh; the door-opening Incarnation
- Hebrews 2:17 — made like his brothers; Incarnation as the condition of priestly qualification
- 1 Timothy 2:5 — the one Mediator; the structural ground of the self-communion’s scope
- Colossians 3:17 — everything in the Lord’s name; the general norm of which this is the Eucharistic specific
- John 14:20 — mutual indwelling as precondition for the soul’s comprehensive enclosing
- Hebrews 13:15 — the continual sacrifice of praise offered through Christ
- Revelation 5:8 — golden bowls of incense as the saints’ prayers before the Lamb
- 1 Corinthians 11:28 — examining oneself before communion; the soul’s communion replacing self-examination with Christ’s own worthiness
ADDITIONS — HERS
Practical application — entering Jesus’s acts after communion: Hogan supplies the operational instruction: “One of the things that is very important to do after receiving Communion is to enter into the acts of Jesus, fuse with him, enter into the acts of Jesus, make them your own and offer them in reparation and substitution for all of us who can’t receive him worthily.” This is the entry’s DW methodology applied to the post-communion moment specifically — the fusing action of August 27 deployed in the Eucharistic context.
“You need to be him to receive him worthily”: Hogan articulates the theological consequence: “you need to be him to receive him worthily. And so we can do this for all of us, make reparation for everyone.” This is the entry’s “how could the creature receive a God?” rhetorical question resolved operationally — the only adequate recipient of God is another Me, which the DW soul becomes by uniting her communion to the Humanity in the Will.
Incarnation as the condition of possibility: Hogan makes explicit what the entry implies: “It was Jesus’ incarnation. It was the incarnation of the Word that enabled this incredible gift to be given to us.” This locates the entire Eucharistic economy within the Incarnation’s prior act — John 1:14 as the ground of 1 Corinthians 11:24.
VIP / SPECIAL DESIGNATIONS
No VIP designation. However, Hogan’s language — “this is a vital piece of information about receiving Jesus in the Holy Eucharist” — carries elevated weight, and the entry’s doctrinal content is among the most architecturally complete Eucharistic disclosures in the corpus.
STAGE TWO SYNTHESIS
The entry’s biblical imagination converges on the Eucharistic-institution tradition (Matthew 26:26; 1 Corinthians 11:24–26; John 17:19), the High-Priestly tradition of Hebrews (7:27; 9:12; 10:5–7; 2:17), and the Incarnation-as-door tradition (John 1:14; 1 Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 2:17). These three traditions are not held separately but structurally unified: the Incarnation opened the door (John 1:14); the High Priest offered himself once for all (Hebrews 7:27; 9:12); the Eucharist seals all creaturely communions with the worthiness of the one Mediator’s self-reception (1 Timothy 2:5). The PDW-1 arc receives here its historical-theological ground: the December 17, 1914 structural apex disclosed the mechanics of the mystical consecration; November 13, 1915 discloses the founding act — Jesus’s self-communion at the Last Supper — that grounds and enables all subsequent communions, including the mystical. Hogan contributes no explicit Scripture but the “you need to be him to receive him worthily” formulation is the entry’s sharpest theological compression, supplying what the entry implies but does not state directly.
Cross-Entry Synthesis
Volume 11 — November 13, 1915 “In instituting the Most Holy Eucharist, before giving Himself to creatures, Jesus wanted to receive Himself. In the Divine Will the soul must offer Communion as Jesus did.”
The Founding Self-Communion — Historical and Theological Necessity
“Before giving Communion to the others, I gave Communion to Myself, and I wanted to do this in order to give to the Father the complete glory of all the Communions of creatures, and to enclose within Me all the reparations for all the sacrileges… Since I enclosed the Divine Will, I enclosed all the reparations of all times.”
The disclosure that Jesus communed himself before giving to the disciples at the Last Supper is the entry’s most historically specific claim and its foundational doctrinal move. The institution narratives (Matthew 26:26; 1 Corinthians 11:24–26) record the sequence — Jesus took, blessed, broke, gave — without explicitly noting a prior self-reception. November 13 discloses the theological content of what preceded the giving: a self-directed communion in which Jesus as both High Priest and sacrificial offering received himself, enclosing within the act the complete scope of all it was meant to accomplish.
The Hebrews tradition grounds the necessity. Hebrews 7:27 establishes the High Priest who “offered up himself” — the offering is simultaneously the Priest’s own reception of what he offers; Priest and Sacrifice are identical, so the act of offering is inseparable from the act of receiving. Hebrews 9:12’s “eternal redemption secured in one act” provides the temporal logic: the self-communion “enclosed the reparations of all times” because the eternal redemption secured in that moment is not temporally bounded — the one act carries all times within itself. This is the ECA-1 Eucharistic form: the same structure that made Christ’s acts eternally operative (September 21, 1913) is here disclosed in the specific Eucharistic act of self-communion, which by enclosing the Divine Will enclosed all reparations simultaneously.
John 17:19 supplies the intentional structure: “for their sake I consecrate myself, that they also may be sanctified in truth.” The self-consecration is for others; the self-communion follows the same logic. The complete glory given to the Father in the self-communion is not separable from the gift to be extended to the disciples and to all subsequent communicants. The giving to the Father is the prior act from which the giving to others flows.
Divinization of Creaturely Works and Sealing of All Communions
“Since all the works of the creatures were Divinized by my Humanity, I wanted to seal the communions of the creatures with my Communion. Otherwise, how could the creature receive a God? It was my Humanity that opened this door to the creatures, giving them merit to receive Me.”
The two claims joined in this paragraph constitute the entry’s most architecturally significant doctrinal disclosure. The first: “all the works of the creatures were Divinized by my Humanity.” This is the NGP-1 doctrine in its Incarnational-scope form — the Humanity as the universal divinizing principle for all creaturely acts, not only the acts of those explicitly united to the Will. The second: the Humanity “opened this door to the creatures, giving them merit to receive Me.” The Incarnation is the ontological condition of possibility for the Eucharist, disclosed as a single continuous act: Word became flesh (John 1:14) → flesh became capable of receiving God (Hebrews 2:17’s “made like his brothers to become a merciful and faithful high priest”) → all flesh’s works were divinized by this Humanity → all subsequent communions sealed by the founding self-communion.
The “sealing” image (2 Corinthians 1:22; Ephesians 1:13) carries precise doctrinal weight: a seal is not the content of what is sealed but the authentication that makes the content valid. Jesus’s self-communion is the Eucharistic seal on all subsequent communions — not repeated in each but impressed once, with the impression remaining on every reception that follows. Creaturely communion is not independently valid; it is valid because it bears the seal of the one self-communion that was worthy.
“How could the creature receive a God?” — the rhetorical question is the entry’s most theologically acute moment. Hogan’s answer is the sharpest formulation: “you need to be him to receive him worthily.” The entry discloses the mechanism: the Humanity made the creature capable by divinizing creaturely works and opening the door — not by lowering the bar but by elevating the door-approacher. The door is divine; the opener is the Humanity; the one who passes through is the creature elevated by the divinization the Humanity accomplished.
This PDW-1 connection is direct. The December 17, 1914 structural apex disclosed the mechanics of mystical consecration: the soul’s will-death as the “accidents,” the Will’s permeating Life as the divine presence. November 13, 1915 discloses the historical-theological ground: the mystical consecration the soul performs in the Will is possible because Jesus’s own self-communion at the Last Supper established the seal that makes all subsequent communions valid. The DW soul’s mystical communion participates in the founding act and draws its efficacy from the self-communion’s enclosing of all times.
The DW Soul’s Communion — “Another Me”
“You — my daughter, do it in my Will; unite it to my Humanity. In this way you will enclose everything, and I will find in you the reparations of all, the reward for everything, and my satisfaction. Even more, I will find in you another Me.”
The instruction to the DW soul to replicate the structure of Jesus’s self-communion is the entry’s applicative apex. The structure is identical: do it in the Will (the founding self-communion was performed by the Humanity enclosing the Will); unite it to the Humanity (the founding self-communion was the Humanity’s own act). The soul who follows this structure will “enclose everything” — the same enclosure the founding self-communion achieved — because she is performing the act within the same Will-and-Humanity that performed the founding act.
The AJD-1 arc’s “another Me” appears here in its Eucharistic form. The October 25 “My Life” and the November 11 “other Christs on earth” named the other-Me reality at the vocational and cosmic levels. November 13 names it at the Eucharistic level: the soul who does her communion in the Will united to the Humanity becomes, for that communion, structurally equivalent to the founding self-communion — Jesus finds in her what he found in himself at the Last Supper. The “another Me” is not an honorary title but a structural statement: the soul’s communion encloses what his enclosed, finds what he found (the reparations of all, the reward for everything, his satisfaction), and is received by him as his own act reflected.
Hebrews 13:15’s “through him then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise” is the general form; the Eucharistic specific is that the “through him” is now disclosed as “in his Will united to his Humanity” — not through him as external mediator but through him as the interior medium of the act itself. The sacrifice of praise the soul offers is not supplementary to the founding act but participatory in it.
The closing of the Batch 11 arc: the batch moved from the FIAT as sweet tie (September 20), through the mutual filling of fusion (August 27), through the Life sown as seeds (October 28), through the taking-and-returning of love (November 1), through the divine vein ascending and descending (November 11), and arrives at the Eucharistic communion as the site where all these prior doctrines converge. The soul in the Will united to the Humanity at communion encloses everything — because the Will is the medium of the eternal creative acts (ECA-1), the fusion gives the divine attributes as the soul’s own (August 27), the seeds of the Life are available for harvesting (October 28), love returned to Christ is genuine (November 1), the divine vein flows between them (November 11), and the founding self-communion’s seal is on every communion she performs (November 13).
Synthesis
The dominant biblical imagination of this entry converges on three traditions: the Eucharistic-institution and High-Priestly traditions (Matthew 26:26; 1 Corinthians 11:24–26; Hebrews 7:27; 9:12; 10:5–7; John 17:19), the Incarnation-as-door tradition (John 1:14; Hebrews 2:17; 1 Timothy 2:5), and the sealing-and-enclosing tradition (2 Corinthians 1:22; Ephesians 1:13; Colossians 1:17, 19). These traditions are structurally unified: the Incarnation opened the door; the High Priest sealed all communions with his self-communion; the soul who does her communion in the Will and united to the Humanity participates in the founding act and is received as another Me.
The three load-bearing findings are these. First, the PDW-1 historical ground: the December 17, 1914 structural apex disclosed the mechanics of mystical consecration; November 13, 1915 discloses its historical-theological foundation — the founding self-communion at the Last Supper as the act that sealed, grounded, and enclosed all subsequent communions. Second, the Eucharistic-NGP-1 disclosure: “all the works of the creatures were Divinized by my Humanity” — the Incarnation as the universal divinizing principle for all creaturely acts, with the Eucharist as the specific form through which this divinization is received and extended. Third, the AJD-1 Eucharistic apex: “I will find in you another Me” in the Eucharistic register — the soul’s communion in the Will united to the Humanity achieves the structural equivalence with the founding self-communion, so that Jesus finds in her act what he found in his own.
Observation Notes
See this note in volume context →
11-1915-11-13
PDW-1 — historical-theological ground of mystical consecration: “Before giving Communion to the others, I gave Communion to Myself… Since I enclosed the Divine Will, I enclosed all the reparations of all times.” The December 17, 1914 PDW-1 structural apex disclosed the mechanics of the living Eucharist (will-death as consecration, Will permeating as divine presence); November 13 discloses the historical-theological foundation: Jesus’s self-communion at the Last Supper as the founding act that sealed, grounded, and enclosed all subsequent communions including the mystical. The ECA-1 connection confirmed: the founding self-communion “enclosed the reparations of all times” because the Will’s eternal completeness is contained within that single act. Governing anchors: Hebrews 7:27; Hebrews 9:12; John 17:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24–26.
AJD-1 — Eucharistic-apex (“another Me” in the Eucharistic register): “I will find in you the reparations of all, the reward for everything, and my satisfaction. Even more, I will find in you another Me.” The “another Me” declaration appearing in its Eucharistic register: the soul who does her communion in the Will united to the Humanity achieves structural equivalence with the founding self-communion, Jesus finding in her act what he found in his own. Completes the AJD-1 Eucharistic dimension alongside the vocational (October 25) and cosmic (November 11) formulations.
NGP-1 — Incarnational-divinization-of-creaturely-works: “All the works of the creatures were Divinized by my Humanity.” This is the NGP-1 doctrine in its widest Incarnational scope: the Humanity as the universal divinizing principle for all creaturely acts, established by the Incarnation itself. Not limited to DW souls but to all creatures whose works were divinized by the Humanity that “opened this door.” Governing anchors: John 1:14; Hebrews 2:17; Romans 5:18–19.