← Diary Entry Iannuzzi Citations →
This page has three parts: Independent Biblical Identification, Cross-Entry Synthesis, and Observation Notes.
23-1928-02-20 Biblical Resonance Analysis
Volume 23 — February 20, 1928 “How one who must enclose a good in order to give it to creatures, must enclose the whole of that good within himself. This happened to the Virgin and to Our Lord. What unity means.”
STAGE ONE — Independent Biblical Identification
Movement I: The Eclipse of Light — Jesus as Light, Life, and Heartbeat
“You make me feel your heartbeat in my heart, and You hide?… don’t you know that I Myself am the light, I Myself am the life, the heartbeat that you feel? How could my Will ever have Its life in you, if your Jesus were not in you, giving the field to carry out the operating of my Will in your soul?”
John 8:12 — “Again, therefore, Jesus spoke to them, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the light of life.” Jesus’ first-person declaration of identity as Light — “don’t you know that I Myself am the light?” The eclipse reveals rather than conceals: the light forming barriers to Luisa’s perception of the Humanity is Jesus himself. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 John 1:5 — “This is the message which we have heard from him and announce to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.” The ontological identification of God with light as the theological ground for the eclipse phenomenon: the immensity of light that surrounds Luisa without offering a visible pathway to the One she loves IS the One she loves. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 14:6 — “Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father, except through me.” “I Myself am the life, the heartbeat that you feel” — Jesus’ self-identification as life grounds his reassurance: the life that Luisa experiences as palpitating within her is his own. Direct doctrinal parallel
Psalm 139:7–12 (translation pending) — “Where shall I go from your Spirit? Or where shall I flee from your presence? If I ascend to heaven, you are there… even the darkness is not dark to you.” The inescapability of divine presence, which applies to Luisa’s situation in reverse: she cannot find the One she loves not because he is absent but because his presence fills the entirety of her interior space. Affective/meditative
Song of Songs 3:1–2 — “By night on my bed, I sought him whom my soul loves. I sought him, but I didn’t find him. I will get up now, and go about the city; in the streets and in the squares I will seek him whom my soul loves. I sought him, but I didn’t find him.” Luisa’s “within an immensity of light and being unable to find the One whom I love” is the mystical dark-night experience of the Song: seeking the beloved precisely within the place of intimacy and finding the search itself blocked by the overwhelming presence. Affective/meditative
John 7:37–39 — “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink! … who believes in me, as the Scripture has said, from within him will flow rivers of living water.” Jesus as the centralized source who must first be fully received before the living water can flow out — the principle that grounds the centralization-of-the-bearer teaching in the next movement. Direct doctrinal parallel
Movement II: The Centralization-of-the-Bearer Principle — Mary, Jesus, and Luisa
“One who must be the bearer of a good must centralize within himself all the fullness of that good, otherwise the good would not find the way to go out… I centralized in Her all the goods of the redeemed ones… I was to be the Redeemer of all, I was to contain within Myself all the goods of Redemption. I am the channel, the fount, the sea… from Me comes the life of all the internal and external operating of creatures.”
Colossians 1:19 — “For all the fullness was pleased to dwell in him,” The divine centralization in Jesus — the fullness of the Godhead dwelling in him so that all Redemption’s goods could be contained in one person and then distributed. The entry’s teaching that Jesus “was to contain within Myself all the goods of Redemption” before he could give them is Colossians 1:19 stated from the inside of the principle. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 1:16 — “From his fullness we all received grace upon grace.” The flow of goods from the centralized fullness to all creatures — the movement from centralization in the bearer (Jesus) to grace-upon-grace distribution to the many. Direct doctrinal parallel
Luke 1:28 — “Having come in, the angel said to her, “Rejoice, you highly favored one! The Lord is with you. Blessed are you among women!” Mary as the one in whom all the goods of the redeemed were centralized — “I centralized in Her all the goods of the redeemed ones, and all that was needed in order to be able to receive the life of a God.” The fullness of grace with which Mary was greeted at the Annunciation is the mark of the centralization that had been accomplished in her. Direct doctrinal parallel
Isaiah 7:14 — “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin will conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” Mary as the sign that the centralization principle had been enacted — the Virgin through whom the Word entered history as the chosen bearer in whom all the goods of the Incarnation had been centralized. Typological
John 15:5 — “I am the vine. You are the branches. He who remains in me and I in him bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.” Jesus as the centralized source from whom all creaturely goods flow — “from Me comes the life of all the internal and external operating of creatures.” The vine/branches image expresses the same ontological origination. Direct doctrinal parallel
Acts 17:28 — “‘For in him we live, move, and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also his offspring.’” The comprehensive interiority of Jesus’ originating sovereignty — not merely external governance but the source of life, motion, and existence for all creatures. “Our reigning is not like the reigning of creatures, who dominate and reign over the external acts.” Direct doctrinal parallel
Romans 11:36 — “For of him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory for ever! Amen.” The origin-through-return structure that expresses Jesus’ sovereignty — “from Me comes the life of all the internal and external operating of creatures.” The prepositions of Romans 11:36 are the philosophical map of what the entry describes relationally. Direct doctrinal parallel
Revelation 12:1 — “A great sign was seen in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.” Mary’s sovereignty over all creatures and their acts — “the height of my Mama possesses the sovereignty over all creatures and over each act and good which they can do” — is visually expressed by the heavenly sign of the Woman clothed with the sun: sovereign queen encompassing all the created order. Typological
Colossians 1:25–27 — “the stewardship of God which was given me toward you to fulfill the word of God, the mystery which has been hidden for ages and generations. But now it has been revealed to his saints, … Christ in you, the hope of glory.” The centralization in the depository (Mary, Jesus, Luisa) before distribution to creatures corresponds to the mystery “hidden for ages” that the steward holds until the appointed time of disclosure. Direct doctrinal parallel
Revelation 3:20 — “Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, then I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with me.” The entry’s note that Luisa will not be given the capacity to manifest truths if “the other creatures are not disposed to receive” corresponds to this verse’s logic: the divine fullness enters only where the door is opened. Direct doctrinal parallel
Movement III: What Unity Means — Adam’s Centralization, Luisa’s Place, One-Will Eschatology
“Unity means centralization and origin of all the acts of creatures, past, present and future. So, before sinning, when he possessed Our unity, Adam enclosed within his thoughts the unity of all the thoughts of creatures, the unity of all words, works and steps… as you rise to that same unity which he left, you take his place; and placing yourself in the origin of everyone and of everything, you enclose within yourself the very acts of Adam, with the whole retinue of all the acts of creatures.”
Genesis 1:26–28 — “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion…‘” Adam’s original sovereignty — “he enclosed everyone and possessed everything” — is the creaturely expression of the dominion mandate: not external rule but originating centralization, Adam’s DW-unity containing the acts of all his descendants in one point. Direct doctrinal parallel
Romans 5:12–19 — “Therefore, as sin entered into the world through one man, … sinners, even so through the obedience of the one, many will be made righteous.” The entry’s unity doctrine is the metaphysical explanation of why one person’s act can affect all: Adam enclosed within his unity all human acts; when he withdrew from the DW, he withdrew everyone’s acts with him. The reversal (one creature returning to the DW and drawing all acts back) follows the same logic. Direct doctrinal parallel
1 Corinthians 15:22 — “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.” The two-origin structure that grounds the unity teaching: Adam’s unity contained all and fell; the Last Adam’s unity contains all and restores. Luisa taking Adam’s place is a further extension of this same typological pattern. Direct doctrinal parallel
Acts 17:26–28 — “He made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the surface of the earth, … that they should seek the Lord, if perhaps they might reach out for him … ‘For in him we live, move, and have our being.’” All nations from one man — the unity doctrine’s anthropological ground: the multiplicity of human acts originally flowed from one origin (Adam in the DW), and God makes humanity from one so that they might return to the One. Direct doctrinal parallel
Ephesians 1:4 — “even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and without defect before him in love,” The pre-temporal election that corresponds to the unity teaching: in the DW’s eternal unity, all creaturely acts were present before time as their origin and source. Adam’s dwelling in the DW was the creaturely expression of what had always been the case from within the DW’s eternity. Direct doctrinal parallel
John 17:20–23 — “Not for these only do I pray, but for those also who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one; even as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that you sent me. The glory which you have given me, I have given to them, that they may be one, even as we are one, I in them, and you in me, that they may be perfected into one, that the world may know that you sent me and loved them, even as you loved me.” The eschatological vision the entry articulates — “one would have been the Will, one the unity, one the echo of all, placing everything in common, so that each one would have enclosed everything within himself” — is the realization of this prayer: the unity of the Father and Son extended to all creatures. Christological/Trinitarian
Galatians 3:28 — “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” The eschatological collapse of distinction into unity — “placing everything in common, so that each one would have enclosed everything within himself” — corresponds to this verse’s vision of all-in-one. Direct doctrinal parallel
Zephaniah 3:9 — “For then I will purify the lips of the peoples, that they may all call on the LORD’s name, to serve him shoulder to shoulder.” The one-unity / one-echo eschatological vision — “one would have been the Will, one the unity, one the echo of all” — is this prophetic vision expressed from within the DW’s own logic. Typological
Colossians 1:17 — “He is before all things, and in him all things are held together.” The unity of the DW — “as if the whole Creation were one single act” — is the Christological description of the coherence that the DW’s unity produces: in Christ, all things do not merely coexist but are held in one. Christological/Trinitarian
STAGE TWO — Comparison with Hogan’s Commentary
CORRESPONDENCES
- John 8:12 / 1 John 1:5 / “I myself am the light”: Hogan explicitly cites both — “John 8, 12. 1 John 1, 5” — for Jesus’ self-identification as light. Both citation streams identify these as the governing texts for the eclipse section.
- John 14:6 / “I am the life”: Hogan explicitly cites John 14:6 for “I am the life.” Both identify it as the ground for Jesus’ reassurance.
- Luke 17:21 / kingdom within: Hogan cites Luke 17:21 for Jesus moving in Luisa’s interior — “the kingdom of God is within you. Let me just write that down. Luke 17, 21.” Both identify the interior presence.
- John 7:37–39 / living water / centralization: Hogan cites this explicitly: “in John 7, 37 to 39, Jesus said that those who come to him and truly drink, that out of their own hearts would flow fountains of living water… I’ve got to put the fountain inside of you so that the living water will flow out of you.” Both identify this as the scriptural ground for the centralization principle.
- Revelation 3:20 / door and knock: Hogan cites this explicitly for the disposition-requirement: “Revelation 3, 20, behold, I stand at the door and I knock.” Both identify it as governing the capacity-to-manifest teaching.
- The three-fold centralization (Mary / Jesus / Luisa): Both identify the formal parallel structure, though Stage One gives it the Colossians 1:19/John 1:16 framework and Hogan describes it through the image of Mary as neck/Mediatrix.
- Adam’s unity containing all acts: Both identify the unity doctrine as teaching that Adam’s DW-unity enclosed all human acts past/present/future.
- The eschatological one-will/one-unity vision: Both identify this as the entry’s closing eschatological horizon.
DEVIATIONS
No divergent angles on the same passage.
ADDITIONS — MINE
- Psalm 139:7–12 — inescapability of divine presence / Luisa unable to flee the One she is within
- Song of Songs 3:1–2 — seeking the beloved within the place of presence / mystical dark-night register
- Luke 1:28 — “full of grace” / mark of Mary’s centralization
- Isaiah 7:14 — the virgin as sign / primary cause of Incarnation
- John 15:5 — vine and branches / all fruit from the centralized source
- Acts 17:28 — “in him we live and move and have our being” / comprehensive interiority of originating sovereignty
- Romans 11:36 — “from him and through him and to him are all things” / philosophical map of sovereignty
- Revelation 12:1 — Woman clothed with the sun / Mary’s sovereignty
- Colossians 1:25–27 — mystery hidden / steward centralized before distribution
- Hebrews 11:39–40 — preparatory provision for something still greater
- Genesis 1:26–28 — dominion mandate / Adam’s original centralizing sovereignty
- Romans 5:12–19 — one-origin metaphysics / why one person’s DW act affects all
- 1 Corinthians 15:22 — two-origin structure / Adam and Last Adam
- Acts 17:26–28 — all nations from one man / anthropological unity ground
- Ephesians 1:4 — pre-temporal election / DW’s eternal unity
- John 17:20–23 — eschatological one-unity as realization of Christ’s prayer
- Galatians 3:28 — all-in-one eschatology
- Zephaniah 3:9 — one-accord prophetic vision
- Colossians 1:17 — in him all things hold together / DW’s unifying coherence
ADDITIONS — HERS
- Psalm 104:2 — “God is wrapped in a robe of light” — Hogan cites this correctly (Psalm 104, verse 2) for the eclipse/light section. Stage One did not identify this passage. Note: this is the same passage Hogan previously miscited as “Psalm 142, verse 2” at February 12 (correction); this is the correct citation.
- Mary as Mediatrix / neck image — Hogan applies the patristic neck-image (Mary connecting Head to body) to ground the sovereignty teaching. Implicit scriptural background is John 2:5 (“Do whatever he tells you”) and Revelation 12:17 (the woman’s children). Stage One did not develop this application.
- Matthew 7:6 (implicit) — Hogan applies the pearls-before-swine principle: “he’s not going to cast his pearls before a swine… he knows the value of what he’s sharing.” Applied to the capacity-to-manifest passage.
VIP / SPECIAL DESIGNATIONS
No formal VIP designation.
STAGE TWO SYNTHESIS
The combined findings reveal February 20 as the most formally developed statement of two interlocking principles: the centralization-of-the-bearer law (one must contain the fullness of a good before the good can flow out) and the unity doctrine (unity = centralization and origin of all acts past/present/future). Hogan and Stage One converge on John 8:12, 1 John 1:5, John 14:6, John 7:37–39, and Revelation 3:20 as the governing texts for the first movement; and on the three-fold centralization structure and Adam’s unity for the second and third. Stage One’s identification of the Romans 5:12–19 / 1 Corinthians 15:22 two-origin tradition provides the metaphysical explanation of why the unity doctrine works — why one person’s DW-unity could contain all — that Hogan addresses pastorally (Adam’s fall drew everyone down). The John 17:20–23 and Zephaniah 3:9 texts supply the eschatological frame for the closing vision of one-will/one-unity/one-echo that neither citation stream had previously brought together in this way.
Cross-Entry Synthesis
Volume 23 — February 20, 1928 “How one who must enclose a good in order to give it to creatures, must enclose the whole of that good within himself. This happened to the Virgin and to Our Lord. What unity means.”
Light and Presence: Immersed in the One Who Cannot Be Found
“don’t you know that I Myself am the light, I Myself am the life, the heartbeat that you feel? How could my Will ever have Its life in you, if your Jesus were not in you?”
The entry opens in the tradition of the mystical dark night — Song of Songs 3:1–2 (seeking the beloved within the place of presence), Psalm 139:7–12 (the omnipresence from which there is no escape even in seeking), and the lament of Psalm 63:1. Jesus’ response grounds the lament in the Johannine theology of divine self-identification: John 8:12 and 1 John 1:5 (God is light; Jesus is light), John 14:6 (Jesus is life). The light forming barriers to perception of the Humanity IS Jesus. Stage One and Hogan converge on these Johannine self-identification texts as the governing framework.
The further implication makes the eclipse the proof of maximum presence: “how could my Will ever have Its life in you, if your Jesus were not in you?” The DW operating in the soul requires Jesus present as the ground of that operation. John 7:37–39 (living water flowing from within only when the source is received) and Revelation 3:20 (the door opened to the one who knocks) supply the complementary principle: fullness can only flow out when first fully received within. Hogan adds Psalm 104:2 (“God is wrapped in a robe of light”) as the OT expression of the same divine-light identification, and Luke 17:21 (“the kingdom of God is within you”) as the theological counter-pole to the apparent absence.
The Centralization-of-the-Bearer Law: Mary, Jesus, Luisa
“One who must be the bearer of a good must centralize within himself all the fullness of that good, otherwise the good would not find the way to go out… I centralized in Her all the goods of the redeemed ones… I was to contain within Myself all the goods of Redemption… I am the channel, the fount, the sea.”
This movement delivers the most formally stated universal principle in the entry: the centralization law. Three applications follow in sequence — Luisa (for the DW Kingdom), then Mary (for the Incarnation/Redemption goods), then Jesus (for Redemption itself). The three together constitute the EML-1 typological arc formalized as a law of divine economy: each bearer of a divine economy must contain its fullness before distribution can occur.
Colossians 1:19 (“in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell”) and John 1:16 (“from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace”) supply the Christological architecture: the centralization (fullness dwelling in one) and the distribution (grace upon grace to all). Luke 1:28 (“full of grace”) applies the same structure to Mary; Colossians 1:25–27 applies it to the mystery held in the steward awaiting disclosure. Acts 17:28, Romans 11:36, and John 15:5 characterize the nature of Jesus’ sovereignty in a way that distinguishes it from external governance: “from Me comes the life of all the internal and external operating of creatures.” He is not merely king over acts but their originating source.
Hogan and Stage One converge on the three-fold centralization structure and diverge in register: Stage One supplies the formal biblical architecture (Colossians, Romans 11:36, Revelation 12:1 for Mary’s sovereignty), while Hogan supplies the relational image (Mary as neck connecting Head to body, Mediatrix of all graces). The distinction Hogan identifies — Mary’s sovereignty by grace, Jesus’ by nature — corresponds to the difference between Colossians 1:19 (fullness in Christ by eternal design) and Luke 1:28 (fullness given to Mary as “full of grace”). The two angles are complementary: Stage One’s juridical structure (rights, sovereignty, origin) and Hogan’s anatomical image both describe the same reality of total mediation.
The Unity Doctrine: One Origin, One Echo, One Will
“Unity means centralization and origin of all the acts of creatures, past, present and future… you take his place; and placing yourself in the origin of everyone and of everything, you enclose within yourself the very acts of Adam, with the whole retinue of all the acts of creatures.”
The unity doctrine delivers the most formally developed ATF-1 statement in the corpus. The All-Times-First principle — the DW having one single act in which all times are simultaneously present — receives here its positive content: unity means being the origin and centralization of all acts past, present, and future. To be in the DW’s unity is not merely to exist where no before or after applies; it is to be the source from which all acts descend.
Romans 5:12–19 and 1 Corinthians 15:22 supply the metaphysical mechanism: the two-origin structure explains why one person’s DW-unity could contain all human acts. Adam’s unity enclosed all because his DW-residence was the originating source from which all creaturely acts flowed; his withdrawal drew all out. Acts 17:26–28 (“from one man every nation”) and Genesis 1:26–28 (the dominion mandate) ground this in creation. Ephesians 1:4 (“chosen in him before the foundation of the world”) supplies the eternal analogue: what is true of the DW’s eternity — all acts chosen before time — is true creaturally in Adam and in Luisa as long as they dwell in the DW’s unity.
Hogan develops the pastoral application of what this unity-restored means — the reversal of all fragmentation, no wars, no slaughter, everything in common — while Stage One supplies the eschatological scriptural framework: John 17:20–23 (that they may all be one), Galatians 3:28 (all one in Christ), and Zephaniah 3:9 (one accord). Together they reveal that the entry’s eschatological closing vision — “one would have been the Will, one the unity, one the echo of all, placing everything in common” — is the realization of Christ’s own high-priestly prayer, the fulfillment of the oldest prophetic voices, and the recovery of what Adam’s DW-residence originally constituted.
Synthesis Conclusion
The dominant biblical imagination is originary-participatory: a God who distributes all goods through a law of centralization (the bearer must first contain the fullness) and whose unity in the Divine Will is the ontological ground of all multiplicity such that to enter the DW’s unity is to become the origin and echo of all. The traditions most load-bearing are: the Johannine self-identification texts (John 8:12, 1 John 1:5, John 14:6) for the eclipse section; the Colossian-Johannine fullness-and-distribution tradition (Colossians 1:19, John 1:16, Romans 11:36, John 15:5) for the centralization law; and the two-origin tradition (Romans 5:12–19, 1 Corinthians 15:22, Genesis 1:26–28, Acts 17:26–28) for the unity doctrine’s metaphysical ground.
The three findings of greatest theological weight: first, the centralization law stated as a universal governing principle — not a descriptive observation about three historical figures but a law of divine economy that makes EML-1’s three-bearer structure intelligible and necessary; second, the unity doctrine as the most formally complete ATF-1 development, converting the temporal collapse of “one single act” into a statement of originating primacy that explains why Adam’s single withdrawal could affect all humanity; third, the eschatological one-will/one-unity/one-echo vision as the creaturely completion of John 17:20–23 — establishing the DW Kingdom as what the Son asked the Father at the Last Supper, making the Kingdom’s coming not a novel arrival but the fulfillment of the Son’s own eternal desire.
Observation Notes
See this note in volume context →
23-1928-02-20
RPT-1 — one-hundred-and-ninth appearance / round in the Divine Will / unity of Adam: The one-hundred-and-ninth confirmed diary-text appearance of the Representative Prayer Template occurs at February 20, 1928: “I continued along my round in the Divine Will, and as I united myself to the unity which my first father Adam possessed before sinning.” RPT-1 total: 109 confirmed.
GCM-1 — centralization-of-the-bearer / most-formally-stated-universal-law: Major new register at February 20, 1928 — the most formally universal statement of the GCM-1 principle to date. “One who must be the bearer of a good must centralize within himself all the fullness of that good, otherwise the good would not find the way to go out.” This formulates as an explicit universal law what has been operative in GCM-1’s specific applications: God always centralizes the full good in the depository before it can flow out. Governing anchors: Colossians 1:19; John 1:16; John 7:37–39. Update most recent to February 20.
EML-1 — centralization-law-applied-to-three-economies / most-doctrinally-grounded-three-bearer-structure: Major new register at February 20, 1928. The centralization-of-the-bearer law is applied in sequence to Luisa (DW Kingdom), Mary (Incarnation/Redemption goods), and Jesus (Redemption). “The same happened in the Queen of Heaven… I centralized in Her all the goods of the redeemed ones… The same happened also with Me… I was to contain within Myself all the goods of Redemption.” The EML-1 typological arc is here presented not as pattern-recognition but as the operation of a universal law. Governing anchors: Colossians 1:19; John 1:16; Luke 1:28; Colossians 1:25–27. Update most recent to February 20.
DW-MARY-1 — sovereignty-over-all-creatures-and-acts / primary-cause-of-Incarnation / no-good-not-from-her / most-formally-grounded-sovereignty: Major new register at February 20, 1928. “The height of my Mama possesses the sovereignty over all creatures and over each act and good which they can do… there is no good that is done which does not descend from Her, because since She was the primary cause of the incarnation of the Word, it was right that She be the channel of all goods and have the rights of sovereignty over everything.” The most formally grounded DW-MARY-1 sovereignty statement: sovereignty over all creaturely acts — internal and external — established juridically through Mary’s being the primary cause of the Incarnation. Governing anchors: Luke 1:28; Colossians 1:19; Revelation 12:1; Acts 17:28; Romans 11:36. Update most recent to February 20.
ATF-1 — unity-as-centralization-and-origin-of-all-acts / Adam’s-unity-as-all-human-acts / most-formally-complete-ATF-1-statement: Major new register at February 20, 1928 — third confirmed diary-text appearance of the All-Times-First Doctrine, and its most formally developed statement. “Unity means centralization and origin of all the acts of creatures, past, present and future. So, before sinning, when he possessed Our unity, Adam enclosed within his thoughts the unity of all the thoughts of creatures, the unity of all words, works and steps.” The ATF-1 doctrine is here given its positive content: unity = being the origin and centralization of all acts, so that time collapses not into mere simultaneity but into originating primacy. ATF-1 total: 3 confirmed appearances. Governing anchors: Ephesians 1:4; John 17:20–23; Romans 5:12–19; 1 Corinthians 15:22; Acts 17:26–28. Update most recent to February 20.
SUW-1 — one-will-one-unity-one-echo / placing-everything-in-common / most-formally-complete-eschatological-SUW-1: New register at February 20, 1928. “One would have been the Will, one the unity, one the echo of all, placing everything in common, so that each one would have enclosed everything within himself.” The eschatological SUW-1 vision is here given its most formally complete statement: not merely unity of wills but one-unity enclosing all acts in common, each creature a mirror of all others through the shared DW origin. Governing anchors: John 17:20–23; Galatians 3:28; Zephaniah 3:9. Update most recent to February 20.
PHD-1 — to-you-as-depository-nothing-must-be-lacking / all-truths-centralized-even-when-not-manifested: New register at February 20, 1928. “If the other creatures are not disposed to receive all the lives of the truths of the Fiat, at the most I will not give you the capacity to manifest them… but to you, as the depository, nothing must be lacking.” The purposive hiddenness operates two ways: the depository receives all in fullness; the capacity to manifest is withheld when creatures cannot receive. Revelation 3:20 and Colossians 1:25–27 are the governing anchors. Update most recent to February 20.
Note on Hogan’s correct Psalm 104 citation: Hogan correctly cites “Psalm 104, verse 2” for God wrapped in a robe of light at February 20 — the same citation she had previously given as “Psalm 142, verse 2” at February 12 (correction #318). Noted for the record; no new correction.